Max Bruch: the Romantic composer you’ve never heard [enough] of


Max Bruch, German composer of the Romantic Era, wrote over 200 works. Ask any violinist and they’ll nod, maybe even roll their eyes, saying “of course, the violin concerto. Played it. Everyone student has.” Or heard it. Or heard Bruch’s celebrated Kol Nidrei for Cello and Orchestra. Or his Scottish Fantasy for violin and orchestra. And that sums up Bruch for most.

Bruch wrote two more violin concertos, that, possibly, you’ve never heard (not to mention a gorgeous Serenade for Violin and Orchestra). He wrote three symphonies that, likely, you’ve never heard. I’m listening to the second one right now. It’s cracking my heart open.

The problem with poor Bruch was, you see, he was born too late. He had to follow in the footsteps of German masters of the Romantic Era such as Beethoven, Schumann, Mendelssohn, Brahms. He learned a lot from them. He loved their structured, balanced, lyrical style; it was what he did best. However, by the time Bruch had a really good sound going, the times, they were a-changing. A new kind of Romantic music was piquing the interest of the public, the more flamboyant, passionate styles of Tchaikovsky, Mahler, Wagner, Bruckner. Bigger orchestras. Bigger risks. Bigger sound, larger than life drama and pathos and redemption all built in.


And like that, the tides had shifted. While Bruch continued on with a successful career, composing, teaching, conducting, what have you, history turned its back on him. It cast him as a side note to the masters and deemed his repertoire, with the exception of his violin concerto and Kol Nidrei, largely forgettable. Not music you will hear too frequently in today’s concert halls.

I love Bruch’s other violin concertos, his Serenade for Violin and Orchestra (op. 75), his Romance for Violin and Orchestra (op. 42), his Im Memoriam (op. 65). And his symphonies. The No. 2 in F-minor, in particular. The second movement. I am utterly smitten. I play it over and over and it’s as if I can feel the spirits of Schumann and Beethoven. They are hanging out with me here as I sit and listen. Check it out.

Where did it come from, this music? What made Bruch write the movement this way, with those swirls of otherworldly emotion, so very much like Schumann’s own Symphony No. 2, third movement? It’s uncanny. I get that same prickly feeling, both elated and close to tears, and it’s like I’ve consumed a shot of something heady, like antique scotch, and instantly my emotions are running higher, as as are my thoughts, my analysis of the music. There is an increased need, almost frantic, to get it right, to explain it all with words. To say, “Folks, this one is a gem. You have to hunt down a copy and give it a good listen. This is pure genius.” No, wrong word. It wasn’t pure genius, pure originality on Bruch’s part. I’d have to give those awards to Mozart, Beethoven, Schumann. But what Bruch produced, is art, that seems to give off an invisible radiance, one you can feel on your flushed cheeks, deep within your heart as you listen. This is art that got overlooked because it came just a little too late in the cycle of things, in the relentless push of progress, seeking out a new sound, something less classically romantic, more gritty and provocative.

The second movement plays for eleven minutes. For that time (because of course I am listening to it yet again), I will once more puzzle over what makes it work, what is seizing my heart, keeping it hostage. I will come back tomorrow, play it again and again, in the hopes that at some point I will find the clues required to unlock that place, release me from this obsession. And maybe, through that, I can crack the nut of why classical music, and art, affects me as it does.

I think the joke’s on me, though. Art can never be unlocked, un-cracked, figured out. And lucky us, for that. It means we can spend our lifetimes exploring, searching, falling into it, loving it.



PS: My heartfelt thanks go out to violinist Salvatore Accardo and his lovely, loving renditions of so much of Bruch’s music. He has my undying devotion. Here are two beloved CDs I own and would highly recommend:



8 thoughts on “Max Bruch: the Romantic composer you’ve never heard [enough] of

  1. Kathleen

    I am only learning classical music and find your description of Bruch’s music, along with the other masters, to be instructive, interesting and even inspiring. I find that if I first learn about a composer, I tend to appreciate the music much more readily. Now it’s time to listen. Thank you!

    1. admin Post author

      Kathleen – I would highly recommend Bruch to a newcomer to classical music appreciation. He’s got a familiar, melodic sound that makes you feel like you’ve heard the piece before, or that you’ve wanted to (if that makes any sense). If you’ve been exposed to Tchaikovsky and Brahms, he lies there in the middle. Or at least that was my feeling. I hadn’t listened to him prior to picking up the violin in 2005. His first violin concerto is well-tromped terrain for any violin student who made it to concerto-playing level. Some members roll their eyes and say “heard it too many times, heard it played poorly too many times.” In truth, that’s how I feel about most of Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker. Heard it way too many times from performing in it. Sorta roll my eyes now when I hear it. Except for the Entr’act, I think it’s called, the lovely music between first act and second.

      Whoops, I digress. It’s just so much fun for me to talk about classical music, though. Now that I think of it, it’s how some women are about shopping, about the things they saw, or bought, the colors and silky textures, and the good feeling when trying it on, so to speak.

      Oh boy, I’ll end here. But thank you for your comment, and please do give Bruch a try. Start with the 3 violin concertos, using the above links. Good stuff.

  2. MarySue Hermes

    Okay, I have to listen to him! The Romantic composers are my very favorites, as you know. And classical music does the same thing to me. It grabs me, and holds me captive and I “see” as I listen. (but not the case with baroque!) Like Smetana’s Ma Vlast, which is my most recent favorite… 🙂 Before that it was Dvorak. And now that I’m studying the Czeck language I understand how his name can be pronounced Dvor-zshak.

    1. admin Post author

      Yes, do. His music is lovely. He’s done lots of violin music – check your local library and I imagine they’ll have a CD with violin concertos 1, 2, 3, or his “Scottish Fantasy.” One of my faves is his “Serenade for Violin and Orchestra.” I think the CD I have is a 2 CD set, featuring Salvatore Accardo on the violin. He’s just wonderful.

      Whoops, I’m repeating myself. That’s what happens when you comment on an old blog, I suppose!

      Okay, take that advice above, and check out the CD. You’ll like it, I’m sure of it.

  3. Iain

    Poor Bruch – Written off, almost ‘condemned’ by his first violin concerto, the Scottish Fantasy and Kol Niderei people forget his other works as you have pointed out – his romances for violin and orchestra, his other violin concertos and the glorious ‘in Memoriam’ ( the Salvatore Accardo recordings of his entire works for violin and orchestra are well worth looking out for). As to the symphonies his first is very classical and an early work but I have always loved his second symphony – the first movement being very dramatic and the second, as you say, exquisite. The third movement perhaps is a little lighter weight and not quite up to the first two movements, but tuneful. One cannot but hope a long lost piano concerto might be found one day. Bruch did write one for two pianos which is perhaps just a little corny / catchy but there are some great ideas within it

    1. admin Post author

      Love all these thoughtful, insightful comments, Iain! Thanks for taking the time to share them. Ooh, a long-lost piano concerto. Something fun to dream about (along with a Grieg Violin Concerto). I will have to hunt down the aforementioned one for two pianos; don’t think I’ve heard it.

      I adore Salvatore Accardo’s recordings of Bruch. Is there any violinist who’s done a better, more comprehensive job on Bruch? Can’t imagine.

      Thanks again for posting!

  4. Andrew

    One more thing to add: Bruch is very much beloved by violists. His Romance for Viola and Orchestra is a staple of the solo viola repertoire, and his Double Concerto for clarinet, viola, and orchestra is one of the finest double concerti by any composer. And there’s also his Eight Pieces for Clarinet, Viola, and Piano.

    1. admin Post author

      Andrew, I’m so excited to read your comments because you’ve just given me new music to listen to! I’ve listened to the “Eight Pieces” and maybe the Double Concerto but maybe not. But I know I’ve never heard the Romance for Viola and Orchestra. Oh, YAY! Off to procure a copy of that. Thank you SO much for taking the time to share your comments!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *